<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are these tits big enough for you?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mybbwsite.com/are-these-tits-big-enough-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mybbwsite.com/are-these-tits-big-enough-for-you/</link>
	<description>...a voluptuary of busty plumpers &#038; big beautiful women.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Very Free</title>
		<link>http://mybbwsite.com/are-these-tits-big-enough-for-you/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Very Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 01:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybbwsite.com/are-these-tits-big-enough-for-you/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry if I sound like I&#039;m picking on you, Reese, I&#039;m not -- I love to read (and watch :-) this blog.  But I (and probably every other reader, too) just assumed that this blog was going to have the same standard of F cup or bigger, after I (we) read the following quotes from your first &quot;Hello and welcome&quot; blog for this website: 

&quot;One of the best things about a BBW is that big breasts come as a standard part of the package..&quot;

And

&quot;I quickly learned that it was the larger ladies who possessed the biggest breasts, and have been in pursuit of plumpers ever since.&quot;

So I just assumed when I commented on that blog, that the less well-endowed plumpers you had featured didn&#039;t have big enough tits.  Thus my comment that their tits were too small.

But now you add to my confusion when you say above, 
&quot;What do you think this is? MyBoobSite?! No, it’s MyBBWSite! And, just because a woman’s a plumper, it doesn’t necessarily mean she’s got huge breasts (sad, but true).&quot;

I realize they&#039;re two different websites, but their author is the same big-breast obsessed guy.  So if you would like to downwardly revise your boob size standard for this blog, just let us know.  :-)
Forgive me, and sorry for my confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry if I sound like I&#8217;m picking on you, Reese, I&#8217;m not &#8212; I love to read (and watch <img src='http://mybbwsite.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  this blog.  But I (and probably every other reader, too) just assumed that this blog was going to have the same standard of F cup or bigger, after I (we) read the following quotes from your first &#8220;Hello and welcome&#8221; blog for this website: </p>
<p>&#8220;One of the best things about a BBW is that big breasts come as a standard part of the package..&#8221;</p>
<p>And</p>
<p>&#8220;I quickly learned that it was the larger ladies who possessed the biggest breasts, and have been in pursuit of plumpers ever since.&#8221;</p>
<p>So I just assumed when I commented on that blog, that the less well-endowed plumpers you had featured didn&#8217;t have big enough tits.  Thus my comment that their tits were too small.</p>
<p>But now you add to my confusion when you say above,<br />
&#8220;What do you think this is? MyBoobSite?! No, it’s MyBBWSite! And, just because a woman’s a plumper, it doesn’t necessarily mean she’s got huge breasts (sad, but true).&#8221;</p>
<p>I realize they&#8217;re two different websites, but their author is the same big-breast obsessed guy.  So if you would like to downwardly revise your boob size standard for this blog, just let us know.  <img src='http://mybbwsite.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Forgive me, and sorry for my confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

